LSK Opposes CJ Koome’s Dialogue with President Ruto
The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) strongly opposes Chief Justice Martha Koome’s plans to engage in dialogue with President William Ruto.
LSK President Eric Theuri asserts that such talks would mock the Judiciary unless President Ruto and his deputy, Rigathi Gachagua, withdraw their remarks undermining judicial independence.
During a protest by Mombasa lawyers against Dr. Ruto’s statements, Mr. Theuri states,
“The Chief Justice should not have dialogue with the Executive in this matter. The President should apologize to the people of Kenya.”
LSK is deeply concerned about the impact of President Ruto’s remarks on investor confidence in the Judiciary’s impartiality.
It believes these statements foster a perception of corruption and subservience to the government.
The society stands in solidarity with the Judiciary, defending the Constitution and the rule of law.
“We firmly believe the CJ should not submit to the Executive through dialogue,” says Mr. Theuri.
According to LSK, the planned dialogue does not align with Kenya’s constitutional architecture.
President Ruto expresses readiness for talks addressing corruption, vested interests, and saboteurs hindering development.
However, Mombasa LSK chairperson Natasha Ali Errey raises concerns about the chosen dialogue route, stating,
“While dialogue shows good faith, we’re apprehensive it’s not envisioned by our constitution. CJ should ensure engagements adhere to the constitution.”
LSK’s opposition highlights the need to maintain Judiciary independence and integrity.
The society believes retracting controversial remarks and upholding the Constitution are essential to preserve public trust in the judicial system.
Therefore, LSK firmly opposes the planned dialogue, urging President Ruto to retract his statements. It emphasizes the Chief Justice should not engage in dialogue with the Executive.
The society calls for adherence to the constitution and protection of Judiciary independence to safeguard the rule of law in Kenya.
